By Jim Sciutto and Greg Botelho, CNN
Hours after a Western
official said a deal could be reached "as soon as tonight," discussions
ended Friday night, a senior U.S. State Department said. They are set to
resume Saturday morning.
By that point, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and British Foreign Secretary William Hague
should both be in Geneva. They'll have company in the form of French
Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, who headed to the Swiss city Friday
night according to an European Union diplomatic source, and Chinese
Foreign Minister Wang Yi, according to his ministry's website.
They all join Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov as well as EU foreign policy chief
Catherine Ashton and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, who have been
the key players in the latest round of discussions.
Together, these diplomats
represent all five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus
Germany -- together known as the P5+1 -- which has been negotiating with
Iran about their nuclear program.
The hastily rearranged
plans indicate that these Geneva talks are continuing past their
scheduled conclusion Friday, though the hopes clearly go beyond just
talking.
After talking to Ashton
and the U.S. negotiating team, Kerry "made the decision to travel here
with the hope that an agreement will be reached," State Department
spokeswoman Marie Harf said.
The Western powers have
been working toward an agreement to roll back Iran's suspected march
toward a nuclear weapon. On the other side, Tehran has been looking for
loosening of the economic sanctions that are strangling its economy.
Zarif said Friday there
is wide agreement except for a couple of points, the semi-official
Iranian Students News Agency reported.
"It should become clear
today if we want to reach to a conclusion in the ongoing round of talks
or further negotiation events are needed," Zarif said, according to
ISNA. "Numerically speaking, perhaps 90% of progress has been made, but
there (are) one or two issues which are of great significance."
A major sticking point to an agreement has been Iran's right to enrich uranium, officials involved in the discussions said.
Iran wants the explicit
right to do so to be part of the deal -- which would likely extend six
months and ideally be a precursor to a more sweeping pact -- diplomats
told CNN. Western powers, on the other hand, prefer ambiguity on this
matter: They don't want that point written into the agreement, but if
Iran states its right to enrich uranium, the West won't dispute it, the
diplomats said.
Talks in context
The latest round of talks comes as a change of leadership in Iran has changed that country's priorities.
President Hassan
Rouhani, who was elected earlier this year, has made lifting tough
economic sanctions against his country a priority.
During a visit to the
U.N. General Assembly in September, Rouhani's moderate diplomatic
approach raised hopes in the West of a thaw in relations with Tehran and
progress in negotiations on its nuclear program.
Despite the sanctions
against it, Iran today has 19,000 centrifuges and is building more
advanced ones, according to Mark Hibbs, a nuclear policy expert at the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. At the same time, the
sanctions have crippled Iran's economy.
Most world powers believe Iran is realistically at least a year away from building a nuclear weapon, Hibbs said.
Iran insists it seeks to
use nuclear power only for peaceful purposes. The international
community led by Israel, the United States, France and others demands
that Tehran dismantle its ability to enrich uranium and other technology
needed to develop nuclear weapons.
Iran recently signed a
deal with the International Atomic Energy Agency that agrees to give the
U.N. nuclear watchdog agency access to long-unseen nuclear sites,
including a heavy-water reactor in Arak.
Controversial approach
Rouhani's new approach has helped bring the parties back to the table, but any deal will have its critics.
Israel, the United States' closest ally in the region, staunchly opposes the tentative plan.
"It's a bad deal -- an exceedingly bad deal," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told CNN this week.
Netanyahu opposes
lifting some sanctions now without getting further concessions to ensure
Iran would be unable to continue with uranium enrichment and other
steps.
Some U.S. lawmakers
aren't sold on the new plan. On Tuesday, a bipartisan group of six
senators urged the administration to reject the proposed deal with Iran
and accept only an agreement that better dismantles Iran's ability to
develop nuclear weapons.
But President Barack
Obama said the current sanctions put in place during his administration
had forced Iran to the negotiating table because of economic contraction
and frozen oil revenue.
He said the proposed
deal would "open up the spigot a little bit" on some of the frozen
revenue while leaving in place the bulk of the most effective sanctions
involving Iranian oil exports and banking. But Obama also stressed that
all options, including military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities,
remained on the table as far as the United States was concerned.
U.S. national security adviser Susan Rice said the plan would benefit the global community.
"The international
community would have unprecedented access to Iran's nuclear facilities
and full transparency into what they're doing, so they wouldn't have the
ability to sneak out or break out," Rice said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment