There was mild drama at the ongoing National Conference on Monday 
when Northern delegates accused the confab leadership of habouring a 
hidden agenda.
Trouble started when Ishaq Modibo drew the attention of the 
Conference, under a matter of urgent national importance, to media 
reports which he said, questioned the integrity of the 
Conference leadership.
Mr. Modibo said two reports on Daily Trust newspaper indicted the 
Deputy Chairman, Bolaji Akinyemi, of lobbying Northern delegates in 
order to smuggle in a demand for a new Constitution in the Conference 
final report.
He also drew the attention to another publication in a section of the
 media, alluding that the Conference was trying to adopt a geo-political
 arrangement in the country.
“Mr. Chairman, I want to urge that the leadership should come out and
 clear its name from the allegations contained in the newspaper report,”
 Mr. Modibo said.
But Sergeant Awuse disagreed with Mr. Modibo, saying that the 
Conference should not be distracted from doing its job because of unfair
 media reports.
To buttress his point, Mr. Awuse said, “We should avoid grandstanding. 
Most of those sponsoring these publications are from this Conference. I 
am pleading that we continue the good work we are doing.
“There are many people who do not support the Conference but there are more people in support of what we are doing here.
“If there is a delegate here who has been approached by the Deputy 
Chairman, such delegate should rise up and say it. But if there is none,
 then we should ignore the publication sponsored by people inside this 
Conference.”
Mike Ahamba, however, disagreed with Mr. Modibo on the need for the 
Deputy Chairman to address the Conference on account of the allegation 
in the newspaper report.
“We must always try to act in accordance with what we know. When we 
started, a lot of people said the Conference will break in down less 
than two weeks,” he began.
“But they have failed. We have a duty to disappoint them. There is no
 young person here; even those who are youth here are not very young.
“When people start writing about things that are not true and quote 
sources that are nonexistent, we should not be pulled into it. If there 
is anybody that has been lobbied, he should stand up and tell us.
Haruna Yerima, however, insisted that dismissing the newspaper publication would not be in the best interest of the Conference.
He said Mr. Akinyemi has been mentioned and the onus is on him to rise up and clear his name.
Mr. Yerima said, “You either clear your name here and now or you will
 have morality demands that you take it on yourself to defend your name 
in this Conference. This is the opportunity for you to clear your name. I
 am advising you as a patriot, as a friend and as a true Nigerian.”
Given the opposing views on the matter, Mr. Ahamba moved a motion to invite those who were lobbied to speak up publicly.
This was supported by Ken Nnamani who argued that it was necessary for the Conference Vice Chairman to clear his name.
He said, “Whereas God gave us two ears to hear two sides of the 
story, I hereby move that the Vice Chairman should clear his name from 
the allegation made against him in the media report.”
Responding, Mr. Akinyemi said, “Since the beginning of this 
Conference, whenever I find controversies arising, I have always tried 
to reach out to people on both divides to resolve them.”
We have an issue coming up which has to do with the modality for implementing the outcome of this Conference.
“I approached those who say they want to write a new Constitution. I 
also approached those who kick against the writing of a new 
constitution. I had approached Ibrahim Kumasi, who is the leader of the 
Northern delegates.
“And I said to them, I have spoken to the people who say they want us
 to write a new Constitution and those who say we don’t need a new 
constitution. I had told him we need to build a consensus.”
Mr. Akinyemi argued that he was merely trying to build bridges 
between the two groups in a bid to create a consensus when the matter 
came up for debate on the floor.
He listed some of those he approached as Iyorchia Ayu, Mr. Kumasi, among others.
Ibrahim Ida argued that two issues where involved in the controversy,
 saying one had to do with a document which he showed to the Conference.
He explained that what was contained in the document were some of the things already rejected by the Conference.
He warned that anybody propagating a report that claims to be an 
agreement made by the Conference was trying to scuttle the entire 
process.
He said, “Mr. Chairman, it is even carrying the logo of the 
Conference. It is now an opportunity for the leadership to come out 
before the world and disown this document. I believe this is the 
time for this Conference to come and disown this document.”
The Conference Chairman, Idris Kutigi, said he has not seen the document referred to.
“I know nothing about this. I have not seen this before,” he said.
Since the name of Mr. Kumasi was mentioned in the newspaper 
publication, he was asked to stand up and clear the air on the matter.
Speaking, Mr. Kumasi explained how the Deputy Chairman had sent a note inviting him for a meeting with some persons.
He told the Conference that he accepted to attend the meeting but 
noted that since Mondays were his regular fasting days, he opted to send
 some delegates to represent him.
He named some of the delegates he sent to attend the meeting to include Iyorchia Ayu, Jerry Gana, among others.
On the final note, Mr. Kumasi said, “Raymond Dokpesi has been 
organising meetings among Northern and Southern delegates. I was told 
that a new constitution has been written.
“Later, Dokpesi came over to me and handed to me the document and 
from that day, the Northern delegates have not attended the meeting. The
 document has the logo of the Conference and even has the name of the 
new state to be created.
“I wanted to meet the Northern delegates but I found this published in the Daily Trust today.”
When Mr. Dokpesi rose to address the Conference on issue, he agreed 
that he was involved in the activities of the National Consensus 
Building Group headed by Ibrahim Gambari.
He said the objective of the group was to close the gaps in the 
decisions taken by delegates at the Conference, adding that membership 
was extended to as many members as possible.
Mr. Dokpesi said right from the outset there were fears that there 
would be problem in achieving consensus on some of the reports, saying 
that leaders of the geo-political zones nominated three delegates to 
join the Gambari-led group.
According to him, during the first meeting, the group tried to 
harmonize the position on the report of the Committee on National 
Security.
He said the group agreed that there was need for a multi-tier 
policing in the country, adding that five other reports of the 
Conference were considered.
“Any person that is honest will say that all the reports of the 
committees are embedded in that report as well as the concerns of the 
all the groups,” Mr. Dokpesi said.
He noted that Mr. Yadudu was not nominated to join the group but he 
came into the meeting, adding that the document prepared was merely a 
working document covering all the issues discussed at the Conference.
Mr. Dokpesi continued, “I want to aver that the leadership of this 
Conference has no hand in this document. There is nobody who does not 
know that what we have is a working document and not the decision of the
 leadership.”
After Mr. Dokpesi’s contribution, Mr. Kutigi said, “It is now clear, 
that the leadership of this Conference is not aware of the report.
“We know nothing about the technical committee. If you want to do 
anything for yourself, you are free but don’t bring us into it.”